sweet‑rippin‑loafers' profile
February 8th, 2006
| Made | Average Rating |
|---|---|
| 16 | -1.00 |
| Total Created | Average Score |
|---|---|
| 2 | (2.61) |
| Made | Received |
|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 |
recent activity
| when | activity |
|---|---|
| sweet-rippin-loafers has no recent activity. | |
most recent sites
| title | views | votes | rating | creation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ?I wouldn't touch | 913 | 9 | (2.89) | 2006-12-04 |
| ?Kung-Fu Fighting? | 1,053 | 9 | (2.33) | 2006-11-20 |
highest rated sites
| title | views | votes | rating | creation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ?I wouldn't touch | 913 | 9 | (2.89) | 2006-12-04 |
| ?Kung-Fu Fighting? | 1,053 | 9 | (2.33) | 2006-11-20 |
recent comments
sweet-rippin-loafers
April 17th, 2007
9:00:52 AM CDT
Reply to sweet-rippin-loafers'
comment on the news post tea for the tillerman.
"invite only" also may create a sense of elitism and act as a deterrent - The bell curve idea mentioned earlier is a decent proposal, although to ensure it it will not be abused (like Iamdavid101010 points out) it will need some evaluation and testing
On on the news post tea for the tillerman.
The best way for quality is a positive insentive for the users to create something good. Whatever that may be. Deletion of poor/dire sites is one way to save money and space, and yet another push in the right direction for better sites. The addition of exclusiveness may be a pinnacle the positive insentive idea made earlier, but may also act as a deterrent for many people for fear of "elitism" and being excluded - Non-famous users such as myself would fit into this catagory
On on the site ?(nsfw) Islamic blasphemy you can take home
althogh confusing muslims and hindu's is...laughable, im still 5ing simply because this site is a laugh ^_^