EDIT: So, no matter how I look at it: our reasons for not liking each other's sites are NOT the same. I provided a valid reason; enough of one to understand why i didn't like it. YOU on the other hand don't like my site, because i didn't like your site. the proof? you are singling out an irelevant typo and passing it off as objective criticism of my site in its whole. what you're really doing is menstruating over the issue and digging for something to make yourself feel good.

So, no matter how I look at it: our reasons for not liking each other's sites are NOT the same. I provided a valid reason; enough of one to understand why i didn't like it. YOU on the other hand don't like my site, because i didn't like your site. the proof? ; you are singling out an irelevant typo and passing it off as objective criticism of my site in its whole. what you're really doing is menstruating over the issue and digging for something yourself feel good. good luck with that. and it is about ego.

your site wasn't funny because it was too vague. we have an image of pancakes, a message that reads "i NEED to make PANCAKES without MILK how do i do it?", and some song strumming along in the background. why is it funny or entertaining that you need to make pancakes without milk? there's nothing else in it other than that for me to decode. even if the song was the main element in the idea, the idea is niche and lacks timeless quality. giving it the 1 star earned by me.

what you're giving me is disjointed rambling that doesn't serve to prove anything. you didn't give me a reason why my site isn't funny, you're just using the typo which has nothing to do with the site's humor. i'm not mis-understanding anything here. i can have all the typos on the title, and it doesn't take away from the fact that the image is a vegetable coupled with the sound "you're a vegetable." the joke is easily pieced together with these two things alone, as it was desgined to be.