And aside from metaphysical arguments, there is no empirical evidence which would prove the existence of a second nature of Things which would therefore state that there absolutely, positively, must be a Cause for every Event. We only know, really, what we've observed.
While the concept of something infinite is absurd, the concept of something with a finite yet extremely massive body with a supernatural plane governing it is equally absurd.
5'ed for great justice.
Whoa. Really dig the clean format and music.
I really love your argument and I appreciate how rock-solid it is. Bulletproof logic.
However, I've got to disagree with you inasmuch as you set up a pluralistic view of the universe. I don't think that there are Platonic 'forms'; you cite beauty, intelligence, and complexity. Ockham's Razor would argue that a less complex thesis is more likely to be correct, as there is less that has to be established, justified, etc.
Sartre's recent comments: