However, today's atheists seem to be offended by religious symbols. Just look at the ACLU and all the lawsuits against religious symbols, such as the cross on Mt. Soledad. These lawsuits are being brought forward by atheists, so that definition of atheist is evidently no longer true...
That's actually a pretty good quickie informative site, but you are missing a lot of Muslim-based killing over the course of the last two thousand years. Also, I believe he is stating that dictatorships that are hostile to any and all religions have killed more people than the other three groups listed. That definition sounds like an atheist to me. However, there is one thing that would debunk that claim. Supposedly, atheists do not believe in any religion, and religious symbols are meaningless to them.
Uh, they have the right to spend their money the way they want, even if it is on useless things. It's the policy of the site, so it's not like they're breaking some sort of policy. However, you have the right to make fun of them for doing so, but you can't necessarily call it "bribing" when it's the policy of the site. I'm not defending their actions, don't get me wrong, but at the same time there is a positive to this: Max got $455.97 out of it.
Mordrach's recent comments:
NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOOO
NONONONONONONOOHOHOHOHOHNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
NONONO OLOLOLOLOLOLOLYES