Kingd there is substantual proof that creationism is false (such as dinosaurs) so what you are saying just sounds idiotic. Evolution can almost not be disproven (i want to see you try). Maybe you should look at evolution a little bit more before you say you can easily disprove it.
This is alot of assuming. Who knows maybe all the stone and earth in the universe was once all one planet. Maybe the Universe was caused by a Scientist in a lab but mixed the wrong materials together and created the biggest explosion that had ever happened that blew up the planet and made the closest source of light (their sun) to implode and spread all the earth around this newly created Universe. sounds stupid and lacking evedince... right. well that's kindof how i look at your theory.
The whole thing is a point of view. You might think that we are dumb for not beliving in god and we might think that you are dumb for doing so. It is an opinion that will most likely not be changed in our lives.
This was a good try to blend science with religion but i see it as flawed. You use the law of causality to say that everything that comes to be has a sufficient prior cause. You then say that there was was a first cause (that started it all) but according to the law that is incorrect. God would have had to have something before him that would have caused him. You use a Scientific law then exempt what you call the first cause. doing so you just broke the law making this assumption impossible.
Bordamere's recent comments: