BlarghLimited's profile
August 8th, 2006
Made | Average Rating |
---|---|
30 | -0.75 |
Total Created | Average Score |
---|---|
4 | (2.71) |
Made | Received |
---|---|
$0.00 | $0.00 |
recent activity
when | activity |
---|---|
March 17th, 2017 | BlarghLimited viewed ?Rice...?. |
April 5th, 2015 | BlarghLimited viewed ?(nsfw) Sounds Like a Good Time. |
April 5th, 2015 | BlarghLimited viewed ?Marv's a Vegan.. |
April 5th, 2015 | BlarghLimited viewed ?LOL, BATTLE! (faster sound). |
April 5th, 2015 | BlarghLimited viewed ?lawl lol haha hahaha hahahaha. |
most recent sites
title | views | votes | rating | creation |
---|---|---|---|---|
?Cream? | 1,571 | 7 | (2.86) | 2007-03-01 |
?Cosby asks a good question. | 1,865 | 6 | (3.67) | 2006-08-12 |
?Birth Control Hurts | 1,708 | 13 | (2.15) | 2006-08-12 |
?There is no bananaphone. | 1,085 | 2 | (3.00) | 2006-08-08 |
highest rated sites
title | views | votes | rating | creation |
---|---|---|---|---|
?Cosby asks a good question. | 1,865 | 6 | (3.67) | 2006-08-12 |
?There is no bananaphone. | 1,085 | 2 | (3.00) | 2006-08-08 |
?Cream? | 1,571 | 7 | (2.86) | 2007-03-01 |
?Birth Control Hurts | 1,708 | 13 | (2.15) | 2006-08-12 |
recent comments
BlarghLimited
August 24th, 2007
8:34:28 AM CDT
On on the site ?YTMND as seen at History Channel
That entire "documentary" was a hit piece against real journalism. There wasn't a speck of truth in it. The fact that they were willing to devote any attention to this website, which is clearly one constructed for humor, is evidence of that. I mean, their entire standpoint was that ANY deviation from the main line of bullsh*t they've been stringing for the past six year is basically traitorous. I'm sorry, but the real traitors are in the White House, and they don't get to question my patriotism.
On on the site ?A scene from the new Scanners remake
I have to give you mad props. The cross-reference was so unexpected. It's kinda brilliant.
On on the site ?09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
I don't even get why people dig HD-DVD so much. It's an overblown, overexpensive format. Standard DVD gives perfectly good clarity. Does anyone really need the kind of detail offered by HD and Blu-Ray to the point of counting the individual pockmarks on Sid Haig's face in "The Devil's Rejects"? The only good thing about these formats is that they've taken the attention away from SDVD so that the prices are going down to a more affordable level. Pirate away, Captain Jack.