TRUTHTMND: PROOF GOD EXISTS
Created on: October 6th, 2014
TRUTHTMND: PROOF GOD EXISTS
This is reality.
None ( ._.)

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(1.86) 7 0 31

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
2 6 3 6 1,231

Inbound links:

views url
51 https://www.bing.com
6 http://www.google.com.hk
4 http://216.18.188.175:80
1 http://ytmnsfw.com/users/woman/sites
1 http://www.google.com

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
October 6th, 2014
(-1)
+1 because this is better than your last one
October 7th, 2014
(-3)
these sorts of things have been long addressed for quite a long time by detractors
October 7th, 2014
(-3)
but just to be a good sport, I will go out of my way to say that the atheist community is far from perfect:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdS9QFaXRQ4
October 9th, 2014
(-3)
Yeah, they're WRONG on the most important issue in the Universe.
October 9th, 2014
(-3)
refusing to pretend to have an answer is wrong?

because that is what christians do.

christian/muslim/jewish/hindu approach: something complex, can't explain it, therefore, god

atheist approach: something complex, can't explain it, therefore, time to do some research.
8 replies hidden 
October 8th, 2014
(2)
was superdreamkilla not proof enough?
October 8th, 2014
(-2)
[ comment is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
If his existence proves anything celestial, it would be that whatever creator or influencer exists is a troll at best.
October 10th, 2014
(-2)
Vote 5, please.
(-1)
1.
(-2)
[ comment (and 3 replies) is below rating threshold and has been hidden ]
(-2)
What a surprise, the [b]FAGGOT!!![/b] catholic perpetual virgin with no irl friends is online again, as always, still posting shitty site after shitty site and still downvoting hundreds of comments after hundreds of comments, as that's the only "attention" or "power" he's got in his entire sad hermetic future pedophilic priest life.
October 13th, 2014
(-1)
The big problem with how you reason about certain things, woman, is that you already have in mind as to what the conclusion should be, then you try to find evidence to support that claim. This is called "ex pos facto justification" or "confirmation bias".

The correct approach is to look at the available evidence, hear arguments from other and competing sources, then try to arrive at a conclusion after an honest assessment of the data.
October 14th, 2014
(-1)
mere.ytmnd.com
October 14th, 2014
(-1)
Arguments against reasoning are self defeating. Because you are trying to use reasons to say why reason does not work. That is like sending someone an email telling them that email systems do not work.
2 replies hidden 
October 17th, 2014
(-1)
I minused both woman and MDS' comments here for seriously debating this on YTMND
December 14th, 2014
(-1)
nice gif but does not prove god exists.
December 15th, 2014
(0)
So where did that come from?
December 16th, 2014
(-1)
Bill Nye the science guy explains it better than me.
December 16th, 2014
(0)
Bro. Peter Dimond explains it better than me:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=PYSmV2FlHDw