Add a comment

You've got to be fucking kidding. I knew you were the posterboy for American mediocrity and all but you're seriously arguing that Wikipedia should be considered a valid research tool because it is "comparable to that of the Encyclopedia Britannica"?!! Jesus peanutbutterfucking Christ, you are a simpleton. You do understand, don't you, that nobody past 6th grade uses Encyclopedia Britannica--or any "encyclopedia" sold on late night TV--as a "research reference," right? Do you have even the simplest understanding of why? That is, do you have even the most basic understanding of what the term "research" means? The entire point of the production of knowledge in Western civilization is not to merely copy and paste a Reader's Digest-level blurb on the phenomena of life but to, instead, provide unique and robust contributions to the collective pool of knowledge. That's precisely why you should be ashamed (but are so fucking stupid that, instead, all you have is false pride occluding the part of the brain where critical thinking typically take place) to have to rely on encyclopedic-level (Wiki or otherwise) regurgitation of someone else's dumbed down, summarized research.

Good god, I knew you were a fucking moron, but really...