Add a comment

When you boycott something, you go out and say people "hey, stop buying this!" or "hey, stop doing that!". I'm not doing any of that, I just refuse to vote on your site, it's no big deal, I've done this many times before. You are just joking about the "preferences", come on! I was talking about your site preferences! Don't be rude, please.

You refused to deal with my site by not voting yet go on the record and talk a lot of shit. You need to look up some definitions and get your life in order. I'll give you a couple days.

2. You claim to have downvoted (and yes, you did implicitly acknowledge that you were downvoting in your first reply) because all of the sites in the U&C and Top Rated lacked effort or entertainment. That’s fine. You’re voicing your opinion with your 1-star ratings. But in doing this, you have to acknowledge that you are essentially downvoting these sites in favor of your own site, a site that most of us can agree possesses both effort and entertainment. Again, that’s your business. Do I find it unethical? Sure, but that’s just my opinion, you see. Facts are facts, and you did downvote the page in favor of your site.

4. You claim that everyone knows of your strict voting standards. The first part of this claim is completely inaccurate. If everyone knew of your voting standards, why didn’t kekko? Okay, so you didn’t literally mean everyone, but you did imply that a majority of people currently using YTMND are familiar with the way you vote. I highly doubt that.

For one, this is a completely different place than it used to be, with completely different users. Maybe everyone knew of your voting standards at one time, but that’s long ago. Unless you’re someone like Umfuld or jimmm, hardly anyone these days has heard of your voting habits, if indeed they’ve even heard of you.

The second part of your claim says that you have strict voting standards. If this is the case, then you should vote 1 on anything and everything that you feel lacks effort or entertainment. How, then, did you end up voting a 5 on [site oprahbees:site]? Maybe you somehow found it entertaining, but if you truly vote on effort, then there is no way that you could have used that criteria to vote on such an effortless site. Entertainment is completely subjective, but effort can be measured very objectively—in other words, you can’t write this one off as opinion. Yes, you can accuse me of cherry-picking, but in order for that accusation to fly, you have to admit that your voting standards are not strict enough to pass inspection.

Ya, I'm not reading that.

Timaeus, a lot of your arguments are poorly reasoned or evidenced, so since Lastimero seems to be done with this bickering (and I don't blame him), I'm going to refute some claims of yours.

Lastimero once told me in a PM that someone once called him the "best new user of 2010," similar to a claim that Umfuld made, documented in the hilariously updated List of Trolls wiki entry. can someone please find out who made those entries and PM me? this is an actual request.