Liberals suck
Created on: July 19th, 2007
Liberals suck
None ( ._.)

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(2.5) 14 0 21

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 1,480

Inbound links:

views url
23 http://www.google.com
1 https://random-website.com
1 https://www.google.com/

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
July 19th, 2007
(0)
(1)
I agree
July 19th, 2007
(0)
GET A BRAIN! MORANS
July 19th, 2007
(0)
Damn straight. We lost Vietnam because of whiny liberal bitches, and it looks like the same thing is gonna happen in this war.
July 19th, 2007
(-1)
Yes because you have a chance of actually winning this war :')
July 19th, 2007
(0)
If we had the support of the people, we would.
July 19th, 2007
(0)
Yeah. If we had full support we would win this war. The reason were going to lose is because whiney liberals want us to pull out. I don't think they thought it through. I mean if we pull out a huge civil war for power will start and the Iraqi Goverment were trying to set up would get overthrown easily. And the civil war that was in afghanistan and all over the middle east will continue to go on. Then eventually like 9/11 out of nowwhere a terrorist will attack us because they hate us. It's a cycle the
July 19th, 2007
(0)
If we had full support we could have been done by now.
July 19th, 2007
(0)
Also Bin Laden is smart. Thus why he is the commander and leader of al-Qaeda . He knows the only way for a small country/ 3rd world country/ or an insurgency or group of terrorist are to beat a huge country like ours is to change our public and media agianst a war. He knows that al-Qaeda can not fight the americans forever and cannot win in face to face war. However he knows that the american public will not support a war thus he tries to use propaganda agianst us.
July 19th, 2007
(0)
I like you.
July 19th, 2007
(0)
And did you know that one of the North Vietnamese generals recent published his memoirs, and revealed that North Vietnam was pretty much f*cked until the anti-war movement started?
July 19th, 2007
(0)
*recently
July 19th, 2007
(-1)
lol, how much support do you need besides the president, who btw was lied t o supposedly, and this is not liberal BS.. the report of WMDs was a lie. That's what the liberals are mad about. And in Vietnam, it was because we waged war on someone else's homeground that we lost, not the lack of support.
July 19th, 2007
(0)
By your logic, that means that we also lost the German wing of World War II.
July 19th, 2007
(1)
You need alot more support. Why because everyone is complaining and so agianst this war that there making congress and politicans have to change ideas for more voters. Also if people stopped complaining about bush he would just let the military do there jobs. I've talked to soldiers who have been there and they said that it's not as bad as it is portrayed in the media. And that if they had more support they could have won. We pretty much did win already within the 3rd week by overthrowing Saddam and killing
July 19th, 2007
(1)
his kids. Also weapons of mass destruction doesn't just mean Nukes. Saddam does have them and there hidden somewhere in Iraq. If you don't believe me then think of the iraq-iran war in the 1980's. He used them on civilians of iran and on there soldiers. Chemical weapons fall under WMD's as well. If you don't think that he still has more or has made more from the 80's onwards then you are stupid. Just because we haven't found them all doesn't mean there not there. Also the public is a big part of a war.
July 19th, 2007
(0)
stay the course
July 19th, 2007
(-1)
In the amount of time we have been in this war, a new generation of fighters has been born, and whose parents are putting their thoughts and ideas into. They live in Iraq and the US, and are fighting their parents wars(coughcough.) I really think this ytmnd is funny. good show.
July 19th, 2007
(1)
Well yes that is true. But either way they are still going to hate us. We have to show them that were not cowards. Us fighting them means were not scared of them. Us pulling out means we are. Our reputation goes down as looking weak. Then other countries f*ck with us. We have to show the countries and the other insurgency's we mean buisness. Also Insurgency's cannot hold out long without there leaders. We've already taken down a main leader of Al-Qaeda in iraq. Abu Musab al-zarqawi. We've already taken 40
July 19th, 2007
(1)
of the 50 on the iraqi most wanted list. The insurgency is crumbling and so are the terror groups. Also the new generation isn't anything to worry about. We've always been outnumbered out there. And we always will be. And we've killed so many that there still not in the strength they were at around 9/11. Plus were fighting them there and not on our turf. It evens out.
July 19th, 2007
(0)
HOW ABOUT A NICE CUP OF SHUT THE F*CK UP?