The Unfunny Truth about Calvin & Hobbes
Created on: April 24th, 2007
Hope I don't destroy anyone's childhood memories TOO much.
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (2.2) | 10 | 0 | 12 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,149 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 3 | https://www.google.com/ |
| 1 | https://www.google.co.uk/ |
| 1 | https://www.google.hr/ |
| 1 | https://www.google.ie/ |
| 1 | https://google.com |
Really? The empirical evidence begs to differ:
1. Calvin is a human boy who carries a tiger plushie with him everywhere he goes.
2. Furthermore, Calvin often imagines this tiger as a sentient, humanoid being, and holds conversatins with him, plays with him, and even lets him sleep in his bed.
3. Calvin often imagines himself as a variety of animals, typically human-like versions of those animals that resemble him, including, among other things, a tiger, an owl, and an elephant.
The defense rests.
Be that as it may, the thing is, Hobbes and Calvin's pretending he is being various animals is the product of his imagination, therefore a world unto itself. Furry suggests that Hobbes is a walking, communicating organism that exists in reality (such as Garfield or Snoopy), which Hobbes (argubaly) only exists in reality as an inanimate object. Therefore, even though you do argue with considerable evidence, I accept C&H as a comic strip about a boy with a fantastic imagination.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link