Kramer explains why OJ was acquitted
Created on: November 28th, 2006
Kramer explains why OJ was acquitted
Kramer explains why OJ was aquitted

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.24) 17 1 3

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 1,767

Inbound links:

views url
45 https://www.bing.com
7 http://www.google.com.hk
5 http://ytmnsfw.com/users/dirkadirka/
1 http://www.google.com/search?q=why%20oj%20was%20acquitted&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&source=hp&channel=np
1 http://www.google.com

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
November 28th, 2006
(0)
using your logic, that would explain why he should have been convicted
November 28th, 2006
(0)
imply that he had money maybe? it was johnny cochran winning over a very stupid jury that got oj off...not his blackness
November 28th, 2006
(0)
Worst YTMND of the week. Downvoting all your past and future sites.