WTF? Max is gone?!
Created on: August 7th, 2006
Go to the site and check for yourself. He was removed.
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (4) | 381 | 1 | 185 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10,974 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 44 | https://www.bing.com |
| 10 | http://www.google.com.hk |
| 3 | http://216.18.188.175:80 |
| 2 | https://www.google.com/ |
| 1 | https://google.com |
I like ytmnd, but think about all the people that don't like this site. Either they think its racists, sexist or a multitude of other things and they probably pulled a rudekitty/happycat myspace thing on this and spammed till it was removed. Probably said he hacked or had someone hack for him. And ebaums is still gay.
mforceofdeath, it's "you make an *ss out of 'you' (substituted as "u") and 'me'. i don't know which parent of your two parents reduced your iq to two digits by repeatedly dropping you on your head as a child, but i'm going to go ahead and assume that it was probably why you came up with this "u-m-e" nonsense.
Because:
a YTMND has racist content
b YTMND users have no qualms about racist content (see IMDB forum)
c Because the distrubtors/marketers/whoeverthef**k cannot risk being associated with any such headline pre-release no matter how minor
I know what the truth is, Ive been visiting this site for donkeys. I'm just stating what the view looks from whoever is handling this specific marketing campaign for Snakes on a Plane.
Cheat a little? Wow, I guess someone writing the code to grant him over 40,000 votes in a manner of hours counts for nothing? One of you ruined it for him, there is no way the accumulated votes by all of you would climb that fast. I love this site, but don't even act surprised and upset over it. iBgerd for the f*cking WIN.
Give you that, i was just pointing out one angle before any flames start.
Heres another angle, evidence of rigging the vote could be inferred from the site a user posted earlier today which illustrated that the message received to confirm your vote was spammable for multiple votes. If this was brought to the attention of the organisers, who knows.
We need to email the officials a very simple and straight forward message. Max did not hack it, BECAUSE HE WAS ALREADY #1! the 40,000 votes he got lately was obviously someone independant from him that was hacking it. I think we need to demonstrate how easily the hackers could just remove the top people by giving them poison votes
Quote "Because: a YTMND has racist content b YTMND users have no qualms about
racist content (see IMDB forum) c Because the
distrubtors/marketers/whoeverthef**k cannot risk being associated with any
such headline pre-release no matter how minor I know what the truth is,
Ive been visiting this site for donkeys. I'm just stating what the view
looks from whoever is handling this specific marketing campaign for Snakes
on a Plane." This is not about who wins in their advertising...
... the point of the contest is to spread word of the movie by having people vote for their friends and get interested in the movie about this. Not about who wins the contest, I bet all the people who have never heard of 'max' have no association with it and ytmnd.com, and I do bet several users here who haven't paid attention to these ytmnd's and might have seen that site have no clue as well. Again, I say it's not a political agenda at who wins, no company would do that...
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They've been weeding out the hax0rz for a while now. Max's votes were pretty much legit (at least 26,000 of them). Max doesn't seem like he'd be one to (or even want to) cheat on something like this. My guess is some cockf*g supporter decided to "lend a hand", or someone intentionally did it to get Max's votes pulled.
iBgerd, the guy who's in first, thinks that Max should get reinstated and win because he got his votes fairly before the hacking. He's been really class about this whole thing and doesn't approve of the Fazers who have been talking sh*t. The guy who created Fazed thinks the same thing. I think both iBgerd and he deserve some respect for that. Just sayin'.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link