Scientology just doesnt fly
Created on: June 15th, 2006
Scientology just doesnt fly
Why used a winged space craft in outer space where there is no lift?

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.8) 206 1 38

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 5,449

Inbound links:

views url
37 https://www.bing.com
21 http://www.baidu.com/s?wd=YTMND-Scientologyjustdoesntfly
10 http://216.18.188.175:80
1 http://ytmnsfw.com/users/miyamoto1952/
1 http://www.google.com

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
June 15th, 2006
(0)
lol, i see what you did there!
June 16th, 2006
(0)
its a good point
June 16th, 2006
(0)
But there are rockets attached to it; HAIL XENU
June 16th, 2006
(0)
Amazing point!
June 16th, 2006
(0)
The same reason why the space shuttle has wings... for landing+taking off. But i still
June 16th, 2006
(0)
luv this ytmnd :D
June 16th, 2006
(0)
ya you can have a 55 gallon drun fly through space just as well if you put rockets on it. But hey, LOL DC-8's what a bunch of f*cking retards
June 16th, 2006
(0)
point has already been made
June 16th, 2006
(0)
Physics > Scientology
June 18th, 2006
(0)
The Church of Scientology has no time for your troubled beliefs, it is clearly just your thetans corrupting you.
June 18th, 2006
(0)
the wings make it look cool, and thats all scientology is really about... no?
June 18th, 2006
(0)
they had to trick them to go on the planes, making them believe it was no space plane. Dumb scientologists
June 18th, 2006
(0)
they have rocket engines if u actually researched a bit
June 18th, 2006
(0)
What are YOUR crimes? What do you have against Hubbard?
June 18th, 2006
(0)
If you actually bother thinking about it, the wings are probably for inside the atmosphere, rocket engines for in space. But the idea that DC-8's make for good space travel is ludicrous.
June 18th, 2006
(0)
"they have rocket engines if u actually researched a bit" I know this, but they still dont need wings. Wings are used to create lift and keep a airplane in the air. In outer space their is no atmosphere to create a pressure change from above and below the wing. Making them completely useless, as well as scientology!
(0)
JBobek--space shuttles dont need wings to take off you silly prick
June 19th, 2006
(0)
HeIL HITLER!
June 19th, 2006
(0)
good point
June 19th, 2006
(0)
drinkinbabies - they have rocket engines if u actually researched a bit Oh of course they did, it all makes sense now!...spaz
June 19th, 2006
(0)
thank you for declaring what i've tried to say.
June 19th, 2006
(0)
The wings could have served a function much like the space shuttle... if it weren't complete bullsh*t.
June 19th, 2006
(0)
Since the planes flew over volcanoes, and were loaded on a planet, I'd say at some point they WERE in an atmosphere. Why do you think OUR shuttles have wings?
June 19th, 2006
(0)
It is true that our space shuttle has wing's, but those are for gliding back to earth. They aren’t used for takeoff because there are useless for that matter. In fact the wings are built to achieve only minimal lift or else it would be uncontrollable on landing. The airframe and shape of a DC-8 is completely impracticable for take off. It is true you could use it to land on a planet, but you would need a runway. (Continued below)
June 19th, 2006
(0)
Maybe using its rockets it could achieve a vertical drop down landing, but then again that would make the wings useless. Also by gliding into a atmosphere like the Space shuttle you generate grate heat. Those DC-8s appear to have no heat shielding, now if you use a slow decent re-entry like what you see in sci-fi movies then sure that would work. Once again though that leaves you with more evidence that the wings are useless, no matter how you look at it the wings are indefensible.
June 20th, 2006
(0)
umm... some people here are sticking up for scientLOLogy. WTF didi I miss?
June 20th, 2006
(0)
it's easy when you're Xenu, lol.
June 20th, 2006
(0)
lol, aerodynamics
June 20th, 2006
(0)
Hrm..........HOW WOULD A SHIP manuver In space anyway?
June 20th, 2006
(0)
THATS A GOOD DAMN POINT!!!!
June 20th, 2006
(0)
thrusters, tuckfard!!1
June 20th, 2006
(0)
There INTERGALATIC ROCKETS on it. HAIL XENU.
June 20th, 2006
(0)
Obvoisly, Xenu brought the plane down using telekanisis.
June 20th, 2006
(0)
win
June 20th, 2006
(0)
you raise a good point but you should be asking how it would maneuvre, not how it would provide lift.
(0)
DC 8, lol.
(0)
hey guys! what if it had a force field?! ehh? ehhhhhhhh?
August 15th, 2006
(0)
i guess when you find a fad, you stick with it.. way to go turd