Evolution stinks. Sure, there are modifications of the gene sequence, like this YTMND says. But it's impossible for one creature to adapt/modify so much that it becomes a totally different creature altogher.

mantenna

May 23rd, 2006

1:06:32 PM CDT

(0)

shut up deloravius, it's people with your lack of scientific knowledge that created this so called debate in the first place. Go back to sucking on Pat Robertson's teet.

roq

May 23rd, 2006

1:07:14 PM CDT

(1)

One word: Mutations. BTW, Evolution has already been scientifically proven, if you disagree with the process you might as well disagree with the law of gravity.

roq

May 23rd, 2006

1:09:04 PM CDT

(1)

Don't get it confused with Evolutionary THEORIES. It has NOT been scientifically proven that humans developed from an earlier species yet, but there is a lot of evidence for it.

ProfGlitch

May 23rd, 2006

1:09:53 PM CDT

(1)

These people believe that some guy died and was RESURRECTED three days later. They've already proven that science isn't their strong suit.

chucknorrisrocks

May 23rd, 2006

1:09:53 PM CDT

(-1)

ytmnd = 5 macro evolution = 0 you get a 3 deloravius is correct... good day sir

Feral

May 23rd, 2006

1:10:09 PM CDT

(-2)

I don't belive in evolution, so I didn't even watch the video, the whole theory is crap, if you ask me.

roq

May 23rd, 2006

1:10:35 PM CDT

(1)

Amino acids and proteins will inevitably occur in the right conditions. All that is needed are the right chemicals + other forces moving chemicals + billions of years. Something will happen eventually.

Funker42

May 23rd, 2006

1:12:39 PM CDT

(0)

male nipples!

roq

May 23rd, 2006

1:14:18 PM CDT

(0)

http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs-evolution.html (This comment box has been officially GEEK'D.)

Lanik

May 23rd, 2006

1:15:42 PM CDT

(-1)

it's interesting how much stock people put in scientific theory. sure, microevolution is readily proven, macroevolution isn't. Just before wanting to believe everyone came from a common (species) ancestor, they tried to prove that black ppl weren't human. Go science! (I actually like science, just not fitting science to personal bias:P)

roq

May 23rd, 2006

1:17:57 PM CDT

(0)

Oh yeah, he forgot tailbone.

MisterMonkeyman

May 23rd, 2006

1:20:15 PM CDT

(0)

Black human are closest related to the original Homo. Life all began in Africa, they were just lazy cuz they didn't want to explore. Others did and they formed the other races that later on would discover more and more.

PVDH

May 23rd, 2006

1:25:27 PM CDT

(0)

Harvy FTW

lowcast

May 23rd, 2006

1:26:44 PM CDT

(0)

i hate our freedom.

harle1012000

May 23rd, 2006

1:27:23 PM CDT

(1)

Evolution is fact in my book. Plenty of evidence over the constantly rewritten bag of fables stemmed by fear we call the Bible.

Lave

May 23rd, 2006

1:28:01 PM CDT

(0)

@Roq. Every f*cking thing science does is a f*cking theory. Nothing gets proven 100% - that's why science rocks. It knows it can be wrong. Where religion is just 100% correct end of story. Like dickwads or children may think

EverTheCynic

May 23rd, 2006

1:28:31 PM CDT

(0)

"Life all began in Africa, they were just lazy cuz they didn't want to explore." Black people? Lazy you say?

Lave

May 23rd, 2006

1:29:43 PM CDT

(0)

On the ytmnd, could you slow the first part down - with the text.

roq

May 23rd, 2006

1:32:00 PM CDT

(0)

I agree Lave, I can't be 100% sure gravity will pull me towards the ground each day, but that's no reason to question if it will or not.

roq

May 23rd, 2006

1:34:58 PM CDT

(0)

Some theories just have a lot more evidence than others. Metaphysical realm, a lot more theoretical stuff. I just don't use that term literally for everything.

thyme

May 23rd, 2006

2:08:31 PM CDT

(0)

...saying you believe in evolution does not mean that you think we've evolved from 'monkies' it means you simply believe that humans have evolved over the years from primative humans to the more advanced humans we are today

Lave

June 28th, 2006

6:28:42 AM CDT

(0)

Then why did you use the phrase "scientifically prove" roq? If you then agree that science does "prove" things like that. Thats not how science works. And even so there is a HUGE amount of evidence for evolution.

Lave

June 28th, 2006

6:30:51 AM CDT

(0)

thymne - we didn't evolve from monkeys, we and monkeys share a common ancestor. But yes you can cop out and only believe in micro evolution - but then surely the more primative humans would just say the same thing - that they evolved from more primative primtive humans and so on back to "monkeys"

roq

September 6th, 2006

1:27:14 PM CDT

(0)

Old posts but.. Microevolution is what I was referring to before.. that's an observable process, which means that evolution is an objectively understood concept, if only in that scenario. As for theories that humans evolve faster than other species, we'll be able to confirm the validity of these claims eventually, if humans are still thriving many thousands of years from now.

roq

September 6th, 2006

2:14:03 PM CDT

(0)

Although in theory, it might be possible to look at some events that occured millions of years ago with the right technology. This is because if scientists can view planets and space many, many light years away.. the light that is reaching their powerful telescopes took many years to get there, so it would be showing them the past.

roq

September 6th, 2006

2:16:34 PM CDT

(0)

(just fiction) but still, if there was a way to get a powerful telescope on the far end of the universe to display images of earth from that point, it could be zooming in on events from billions of years ago.

Austovin

September 6th, 2006

8:26:01 PM CDT

(0)

Win

bonushobo

January 14th, 2007

3:27:54 AM CST

(0)

A growing burden. Mean while Warr arose, And fields were fought in Heav'n; wherein remaind (For what could else) to our Almighty Foe

darkreign

February 20th, 2007