Enhancement done with Adobe® Photoshop®
Created on: August 14th, 2005
Enhancement done with Adobe® Photoshop®

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.72) 158 0 59

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 5 3 4 24,204

Inbound links:

views url
51 https://www.bing.com
6 http://216.18.188.175:80
2 http://www.google.com.hk
1 https://google.com
1 http://www.genmay.com/showthread.php?s=fa363250af860917d763803026add8c9&t=618761&page=2

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
August 14th, 2005
(0)
5 since I think it was my site that first used that version of the loop.
August 14th, 2005
(0)
i think if enough people use "photoshop" as a word, they can lose their trademark. It almost happened to xerox.
December 6th, 2005
(0)
There was a similar ytmnd about legos, or "lego(tm) blocks"
December 26th, 2005
(2)
The photoshopper photoshopped a funny photoshop picture using photoshop's new features added since PS 1.6. Haha, I broke every rule. WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?!?!
December 26th, 2005
(0)
I think that image was enhanced using Adobe Photoshop. I can tell because of some of the pixels and from having seen a lot of images enhanced with Adobe Photoshop in my time.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
Nobody pays for Photoshop :(
December 26th, 2005
(0)
Lets do it to piss them off
December 26th, 2005
(1)
Uh huh, sure. We're all going to go through all that trouble just to explain how we photoshopped something. And maybe on that day, O.J. will find the real killer.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
Nice try, Adobe®, but I still photoshop things using Photoshop.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
When they find out I call it "Potatoshop", they're gonna have such an emo orgy.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
XD bwahaha, f*ck adobe in the ass. ms paint ftw
December 26th, 2005
(0)
LOLawyer
December 26th, 2005
(0)
Top viewed omigosh
December 26th, 2005
(0)
Buncha f*cking grammar nazis.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
its not even grammar nazism, it's trademark oppression ! duh. by the way, im gonna gimp somethin' serious right now. bye, and keep it up !
December 26th, 2005
(0)
I have paintshop pro, it is registered to Mr Po Po. I'm sure most people on the internets don't pay for their software either because...THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH IT. Oh at lmao@Potatoshop
December 26th, 2005
(0)
+3 for the image +2 for using The Final Countdown
December 26th, 2005
(0)
he photoshoped it
December 26th, 2005
(0)
I used to drop my pictures off at the photoshop to have them developed.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
It's not their job to teach us how to talk. Who do they think they are?
December 26th, 2005
(0)
http://www.adobe.com/misc/trade.html
December 26th, 2005
(0)
XD
December 26th, 2005
(0)
haha 5'd for final countdown!
December 26th, 2005
(0)
"Uh huh, sure. We're all going to go through all that trouble just to explain how we photoshopped something. And maybe on that day, O.J. will find the real killer." Well, OJ did photoshop the blood off the glove, and he did do some photoshopping to m
December 26th, 2005
(0)
How anal retentive can a company be? @_@
December 26th, 2005
(0)
Hey, I don't care
December 26th, 2005
(0)
kiss my*ssadverb
December 26th, 2005
(0)
I saw this years ago, -2 for oldness +3 cause its still kinda funny and has good music.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
^^Jazu got the point - if a tradename is too commonly used, a co. can lose the power to claim exclusive right to it - e.g. apirin, heroin, escalator, thermos, etc. Adobe wins, b/c it's a household name, but will lose b/c it's TOO common.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
I predict "photoshopping" will get in the Oxford English Dictionary as "computer photo manipulation", and Adobe will fight it.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
LOL trademark dilution
December 26th, 2005
(0)
:O
December 26th, 2005
(0)
And they think people stick to that rules? lol!
December 26th, 2005
(0)
5 because their tademark can lick my sack. No one buys PS anyways.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
No one buys photoshop? Then why would it still be produced, ultimo101?
December 26th, 2005
(0)
I'd think they'd be happy their program is now a household name
December 26th, 2005
(0)
December 26th, 2005
(0)
Adobe can suck my cock if they think I'll stop saying photoshopped. Europe also kicks ass.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
Trademarks are serious business
December 26th, 2005
(0)
Saw it years ago
December 26th, 2005
(0)
You speak the truth? This image was not photoshopped?
December 26th, 2005
(0)
Adobe should be grateful that they've made a product popular enough to be verbed. The will of Teh People cannot be denied! Jell-O! Velcro! Band-aid! Kleenex! f*cking PHOTOSHOP!!!!ONE
December 26th, 2005
(0)
I mean enhanced with Abore Phoshotop...
December 26th, 2005
(0)
guess they really resent it when people say photoshopped
December 26th, 2005
(0)
You fail at cultural knowledge.
December 26th, 2005
(0)
that text is so fugly... 5'd
December 26th, 2005
(0)
oh yeah, i also pirate photoshop to photoshop some leet photoshops
December 27th, 2005
(0)
Instant 5 for The Final Countdown.
December 27th, 2005
(0)
corporate rules FTL IT WAS PHOTOSHOPPED
December 27th, 2005
(0)
I'm surprised they don't mention anything about saying "Shop" which is what most people say. "This image was shopped! I can tell by the pixels, and I've seen many shops in my time"
December 27th, 2005
(0)
Who cares, I didn't even pay for my copy.
December 28th, 2005
(0)
hahahahahaha who's gonna use that... p.s. I photoshop photoshopped photoshops all day long
December 28th, 2005
(0)
will things ever be the same again? it's the final countdown
December 30th, 2005
(0)
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,48625,00.html
June 6th, 2006
(0)
Hm, I've seen the image somewhere before. It's still funny to imagine someone saying things like that.
January 31st, 2007
(0)
363
April 17th, 2007
(0)
There is nothing at all that's strange about that. They have a trademark, and if they don't actively project that they have an interest in protecting that trademark, they risk losing it, because "it's not a trademark, it's slang, and you can't copyright slang."
April 24th, 2007
(0)
Sandy vagina, hooo!
May 22nd, 2007
(0)
I believe this image has been edited with Adobe® Photoshop® software.