Ron Paul 2008 (vote 5 if you support)
Created on: August 15th, 2007
If you want the right man for the job, it's Ron Paul!
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.09) | 43 | 1 | 36 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,724 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 1 | https://random-website.com |
| 1 | https://google.com |
I prefer the ripoff. It's your time and effort spent making political ytmnds. I'm all for you speaking your views. But America doesn't want Ron Paul. At all. And we're a democracy so you lose. Ron Paul's organization is closely related to the infamously racist and organized crime organ that was Lyndon LaRouche's. Oh, and most people are glad we stopped Saddam, just ticked that the war isn't run very well. Ron Paul can't even control you, much less fight terrorists as well as Hillary or Rudy.
Yes, imaginary in a world where every politician is the exact same. Ron Paul is different, he strongly believes in his convictions and makes those convictions clear in his campaign. Bush has trampled on the constitution and the civil liberties of every single American citizen and Ron Paul wants to make things right.
um, gravel doesn't want income tax either. he supports a national sales tax, which is fine by me. I don't want no taxes, and I support the states' rights to do whatever they want, including a progressive income tax at that level. but federal government should only get as much money as the economy dictates.
This is the same Ron Paul whose senior campaign staff encouraged supporters to steal bus rides and registration fees from actually successful candidates and their supporters? Ron won't take responsibility for the unethical activities of Ron Paul supporters. A very weak leader who makes grandiose promises.
Ron Paul votes for pork spending that takes money from each agency's actual mandate, forcing tax hikes, then Ron votes against the hike and pretends he isn't corrupt. Worse than Clinton or Rudy.
The Houston Chronicle noted his extremely high number of pork earmarks. Ron Paul is the king of pork. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/side2/4934728.html
This piggish spending forces our agencies to build crap we don't need (that helps the lobbying companies that feed Ron Paul's wonderful lifestyle). Then the agencies need more money and our taxed go up. But Ron Paul votes against th tax hike and pretends he has no idea what the spending problem is.
Any of you out there that follow internet technology news knows that Roy R. Schecter is one of the worst spammers in the world who has fled prosecution. He's also an employee of Ron Paul's spammalicious campaign and promises to contact 2 billion people with Ron Paul's emails. http://www.avantnews.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=348
How is Roy able to email so many people? By using malware, which is a federal crime.
Okay, now we're getting somewhere. Show which one of these earmarks are pork barrels, show where this caused a tax hike. On a side note, Ron Paul has very little financial support in his campaign. You also failed to supply a citation for the "bus ride and registration fee" theft you earlier claimed.
Avant News? Are you freaking serious? Avant News is a site which writes FAKE news articles. From the site's very own disclaimer: "Avant News is a one-of-a-kind news source that provides the ultimate in late-breaking news: news that hasn't even broken yet. News that won't break for weeks, months, years, or centuries. News that, in fact, may never break, because it is news from the future[...]" You fail.
ytmnd is not a political forum and isn't meant for this type of chit chat. Thus it chopped up the NYT link. You can figure out how to get to the source if you care (hint: google). Frankly, I don't care much about politics, I just don't like being called a liar by some *ssh*le. I sincerely doubt Ron Paul's campaign was helped much by this stupid ytmnd, which I find funny as hell. Who is about fifteen times as popular as Ron Paul? George W. Bush. That's how rejected Ron Paul is.
striker, the new york times link demonstrated the bus and 35$ fee per person claim. The Avant news thing was a joke. I was making fun of your spamming.
Is the New York Times not reputable to you? Trust me, I don't really care what you think.
I think the voters can look at Ron Paul's awful record of spending hundreds of millions of dollars on crap and decide if it was pork (that's an unprovable but obvious opinion), and if it raised taxes (obviously true). All I have to prove is Ron spends a sh*tload.
Ron Paul has no support for his campaign even though he hails from the Houston region, one of the wealthiest places in the world with a huge middle class. no one supports him because he's a crook. And by crook, I mean far worse than Hillary or Giuliani, who are actually not so bad beyond deviating from whatever policy perspective one might have. If you really believe Ron is a libertarian (hilariously untrue), then it should be really easy to explain why we need each and every one earmark. Case closed.
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link