uhhh hello... it technically didn't have anything to do with the attacks... it was to unseat a dictator who should have been removed 10 years prior... what, did you just join political science in community college and your professor fed the class this garbage?

BSims

August 22nd, 2006

1:03:08 PM CDT

(0)

that isn't bush

Phrozinphish

August 22nd, 2006

1:03:56 PM CDT

(0)

Hahaha, bush being dumb and Stinkfist. 5'd

Kacen

August 22nd, 2006

1:05:28 PM CDT

(0)

So the truth is confirmed...

Servo

August 22nd, 2006

1:05:58 PM CDT

(0)

^lol @ neocon blahbalicious

GIVEMEREPLAY

August 22nd, 2006

1:06:08 PM CDT

(0)

"it was to unseat a dictator who should have been removed 10 years prior." Which is why it is a problem that the Bush administration claims that Saddam was involved with 9/11 and Al Qaeda.

Eldrac

August 22nd, 2006

1:07:33 PM CDT

(0)

Is that a suprise to anyone...?

Refractor

August 22nd, 2006

1:08:31 PM CDT

(0)

Did anyone really think that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 anyway?

science

August 22nd, 2006

1:09:44 PM CDT

(0)

^Yes. 50% of Americans in a poll last year.

Hackuuna

August 22nd, 2006

1:11:50 PM CDT

(0)

What's with the use of this "technically" bullsh*t? Just say "it didn't have anything to do with the attacks".

ReVerb

August 22nd, 2006

1:15:45 PM CDT

(0)

2^ Cause 50% of Americans didn't really pay attention to the newscasts, they just heard "War in Iraq" and answered the poll.

JDawg40

August 22nd, 2006

1:30:51 PM CDT

(0)

Dumb f*cking old news, of course Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 where have you been for last 5 F*CKING years??? Are you all this F*CKING STUPID??? HE ASKED AN IGNORANT QUESTION!! you all fail at being humans.....

GIVEMEREPLAY

August 22nd, 2006

1:32:39 PM CDT

(0)

^ Bush has implied for the last 5 years that Saddam had some hand in 9/11, hence why this is important.

Refractor

August 22nd, 2006

1:36:35 PM CDT

(0)

Implied does not mean fact...ANY news station like CNN could have told you this.

GIVEMEREPLAY

August 22nd, 2006

1:50:42 PM CDT

(0)

" Implied does not mean fact...ANY news station like CNN could have told you this. " Indeed, an implication is not a fact. There was no 9/11 Iraq connection. That didn't stop the Bush administration from getting a majority of Americans to believe there was.

CaBluesman

August 22nd, 2006

3:16:37 PM CDT

(0)

When exactly did the Bush administration claim that Saddam or Iraq were involved in the 9/11 attacks? Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't we in Iraq because of fake wmd's, oil, and revenge for Bush's daddy?

mancer0

August 22nd, 2006

3:38:21 PM CDT

(0)

read it sh*t head neo-cons! http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/08/21/bush-says-iraq-had-%e2%80%98nothing%e2%80%99-to-do-with-911/

mancer0

August 22nd, 2006

3:39:43 PM CDT

(0)

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/08/21/bush-says-iraq-had-%e2% 80%98nothing%e2%80%99-to-do-with-911/

mancer0

August 22nd, 2006