Epic Fish Maneuver
Created on: July 6th, 2006
the end of the controversial 1990 FNM video for "epic" - of course noone will read this description, and will not get it, because they are children. this is a parody of the fad, not a part of it. http://youtube.com/watch?v=boqTP047T78&search=faith%20no%20
None ( ._.)
Sponsorships:
| user | amount | user | amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| No one has sponsored this site ( ._.) | |||
| Sponsor this site! | Total: $0.00 | Active: $0.00 | |
Vote metrics:
| rating | total votes | favorites | comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| (3.73) | 205 | 6 | 84 |
View metrics:
| today | yesterday | this week | this month | all time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6,354 |
Inbound links:
| views | url |
|---|---|
| 43 | https://www.bing.com |
| 4 | http://www.google.com.hk |
| 1 | http://www.google.com/search |
| 1 | http://ytmnsfw.com/users/hanktherapper/favorites |
| 1 | http://www.google.com |
Listen you cockf*g, I have a rule of 5'ing all puns, because they have ALL BEEN CLEVER, but this isn't 5'able. The pun is lame and forcedly obvious, and the song sucks, as does the band and music video. Why must you and a choice few others constantly test my golden rules about 5'ing by smashing humorous trends into the ground? =( Also it's a stupid fish jumping, and not even in slow-mo or with neon rave glowsticks or anything, so lame pun gets you 1.
So why did you replace the Nightwish? OK, it took me a few seconds to figure out the play on words. To be fair, this is one of those songs that you might not know the name of, because the repeated lyrics are "What is it?" or "You Want it all" which is what most people thought the title was. I loved this video but would usually change the channel before the fish scene. I was like "Do I really wanna see an exploding piano THAT badly?"
Analogously, this analysis of a formative as a pair of sets of features is not quite equivalent to the ultimate standard that determines the accuracy of any proposed grammar. In the discussion of resumptive pronouns following (81), the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is, apparently, determined by a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. However, this assumption is not correct, since the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccess
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link