A Completely Original and Clever YTMND
Created on: February 11th, 2006
A Completely Original and Clever YTMND
Waziot 
iamjackstiredfad.ytmnd.com
It came to me in a dream
Me
Me

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(1.81) 180 2 40

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
1 1 0 0 1,648

Inbound links:

views url
38 https://www.bing.com
2 http://216.18.188.175:80

Add a comment

Richtext is ON
Bold
Italic
Underline
Code
User Link
Site Link
Please login or register to comment.
Waziot
February 11th, 2006
12:30:04 AM CST
(0)
Aw my ytmnd is ruined, it won't loop correctly. :(
zomglolwtfzor
February 11th, 2006
12:32:06 AM CST
(0)
!!!!!!!!!!!
zomglolwtfzor
February 11th, 2006
12:33:12 AM CST
(0)
btw look here quackedlikesmokeys.ytmnd.com its a similar site
Dopplegamer
February 11th, 2006
12:34:25 AM CST
(0)
Yes, it's original. No need to worry about the downvoters.
jabberwocky39
February 11th, 2006
1:18:23 AM CST
(0)
i love it.
Drac
February 11th, 2006
9:24:17 PM CST
(0)
downvoted because I can. Also, because you accredited anything to yourself. You are egotistical, therefore 1'd.
Waziot
February 11th, 2006
10:37:11 PM CST
(0)
What I did was quite a bit different from what you did with the Dane Cook ytmnd. I actually edited and compiled images and audio together to the point where it barely resembles if at all the original product.
Waziot
February 11th, 2006
10:38:46 PM CST
(0)
What you did was take a sound byte and a Dane Cook picture off of Google and post it straight onto ytmnd. Nothing is attributed to you, you are just a medium between Google and ytmnd.
davedevil16
February 14th, 2006
5:49:53 PM CST
(0)
LOL it's funny being sarcastic. you hate fads yet you give into this one. yes, the "ytmnd fads suck HAHAHA sarcasm" is a fad. you sir, are a hypocrit.
Waziot
February 14th, 2006
5:53:08 PM CST
(0)
My ytmnd is counter productive to the fads though. If people see this ytmnd associated with the fad in question it gives them a bad memory concerning the fad itself and hopefully over time will prevent them from submitting to these fads anymore.
davedevil16
February 14th, 2006
5:55:08 PM CST
(0)
but it is still a fad. it's a paradox. if you want to be credible, start giving better votes to sites that actually are original. b/c if you don't, you'll turn into tehpwner2. and that is NOT a good thing
Waziot
February 14th, 2006
7:04:31 PM CST
(0)
That's kind of irrelevant though, it's a means to an end. Here's an example, I am a baker at a cake shops and I think that a certain type of cake being made is stupid.
Waziot
February 14th, 2006
7:08:22 PM CST
(0)
These types of cakes have been getting progressively worse in quality so I decide to make mine with raw bacon inside them. I put a little sign on the cake that says "The Best of the Bunch" A person decides to purchase one and when tries it finds it to be
Waziot
February 14th, 2006
7:09:46 PM CST
(0)
horrible. And in a way this cake puts them off from all the other low quality cakes in the group which eventually shuts down the low quality cake market. My cake is still technically a cake, but it's doing it's part to sink a string of bad cakes. The fact
Waziot
February 14th, 2006
7:11:16 PM CST
(0)
that it isn't a cake isn't the point. And as to me voting "fairly" on a original sites. I do give higher votes for original sites that are good. Another factor that comes into play with this voting process is whether any of that goodness is credited to th
Waziot
February 14th, 2006
7:13:24 PM CST
(0)
the creator. The reason you don't see me giving high votes to that many sites is because there aren't that many good original sites. As well being original doesn't alway make a site good and some of the vote is credited to preference, which really isn't y
Waziot
February 14th, 2006
7:15:45 PM CST
(0)
your job to change. I may be a bit selective, but if you make a site that is good, funny, original, and you yourself had a hand in manipulating or creating it in order to make it good, I will give you a much better rating.
Waziot
February 14th, 2006
7:29:15 PM CST
(0)
Wow actually disregard all my comics, you sir are a coward. On the one site you comment on you vote a three as an illusion while on the others you downvote all of them. I don't really mind the downvoting so much as your supposed appearance of being a dipl
Waziot
February 14th, 2006
7:30:53 PM CST
(0)
diplomat. If you're going to snake behind my back and downvote the rest of my sites atleast own up to it instead of being a two-faced pussy hiding behind your anonymity over the internet.
davedevil16
February 14th, 2006
8:10:31 PM CST
(0)
i had originally thought you to be a senseless downvoter, but i now have respect for you after those comments. i downvoted you originally b/c your constant 1'ing on every site i saw was pissing me off. i voted 1 before we had this little chat. sorry about
davedevil16
February 14th, 2006
8:11:58 PM CST
(0)
that. i guess you have a point with the 'cake' reference, but remember, you're not the first to do it. i'm going to make it my mission to get a 5 from you one day on one of my sites.
davedevil16
February 14th, 2006
8:14:55 PM CST
(0)
you're right though, and b/c of that i'll change all my votes to 4's
Waziot
February 14th, 2006
8:16:42 PM CST
(0)
Hehe that's fine, I was just making sure you weren't the kind of person who did that sort of thing. And as for the sites I'll look over the old ones and vote on any I like. (Don't worry, if I don't like one I just won't vote on it.) But don't think it's i
Waziot
February 14th, 2006
8:17:53 PM CST
(0)
impossible, I've 5'd my fair share of sites :D Also for being a good sport about my downvotes on you I'll change all mine to 3's.
davedevil16
February 14th, 2006
8:27:36 PM CST
(0)
thanks man. you're the most misunderstood downvoter next to inkdrinker. lol
StarvingBum
February 15th, 2006
2:54:55 AM CST
(0)
Kasanova
February 17th, 2006
11:06:54 PM CST
(0)
Downvoted for being a little bitch
Waziot
February 17th, 2006
11:09:27 PM CST
(0)
I downvoted your Ohio one because I didn't think it was very funny to begin with and then the whole Jesus thing killed any possible other rating I might have given you.
jabberwocky39
February 18th, 2006
10:59:17 PM CST
(0)
it's so ugly and obnoxious i love this ytmnd
OmniIcyshelf
February 19th, 2006
12:36:48 PM CST
(0)
Seven billion to one, bitch.
Waziot
February 19th, 2006
12:40:02 PM CST
(0)
Why do people always choose this one to comment on?
Treevore
February 26th, 2006
10:01:16 PM CST
(0)
5'd cause everyone seems to hate it, and I love it.
inkdrinker
March 2nd, 2006
11:51:00 PM CST
(1)
This was pretty "meh" until I waited toward the end and then DAMN.
Faust
March 6th, 2006
7:56:06 PM CST
(0)
1'd for stupid. 1'd further for your f*cking essay.
Rolento
April 6th, 2006
9:35:28 PM CDT
(0)
I heart you.
Waziot
April 6th, 2006
9:37:09 PM CDT
(0)
Thanks friend :D
DaChazman
April 22nd, 2006
10:48:29 AM CDT
(0)
lol, you remind me of Daltonofzeal2.
kuntakinte
May 2nd, 2006
5:10:57 PM CDT
(0)
you are not the sharpest tool in the shed are you waziot?
Nonkosher
July 25th, 2006
7:23:29 AM CDT
(0)
f*ck yeah
DisEstablishment
October 22nd, 2006
2:32:26 PM CDT
(0)
How many people have made this exact same site with loud sound and random pictures of fads? Your idea on people being unoriginal isn't even original. I love the irony