Dominatrix had ONE WEAKNESS!
Created on: January 31st, 2006
Dominatrix had ONE WEAKNESS!

Sponsorships:

Vote metrics:

rating total votes favorites comments
(3.03) 157 0 40

View metrics:

today yesterday this week this month all time
0 0 0 0 2,169

Inbound links:

views url
4 https://www.google.com/
3 http://ytmnsfw.com/users/w3bx/
1 http://www.google.com/search?q=dominatrix+weaknesses&hl=en&gbv=2
1 https://www.google.pt/
1 https://google.com

Add a comment

Please login or register to comment.
January 31st, 2006
(0)
Wow
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
For those of you keeping score, that's leather-clad, domineering bitches 1, the law 0.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
I had already read about this, but that's still a huge crack in the system.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
What? I dont get it?
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Whaaaaaaaat...
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Ummm... Wtf?? SOMEBODY KILL THAT BITCH!!!
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
And she was about a 6 on the scale too. BSDM > j00
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
BSDM does > j00
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
thats f*cked up
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
what the f*ck?
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
I can't believe that little slut got off, stupid jury lol
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
I love America.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
They shouldn't have brought that case to court. They didn't have enough evidence.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Dominatrix wins.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
5 for the find, -2 for no Image Origin and the text blocking the picture of the dominatrixing prosecutor.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Damn it! Why do all the *ssholes get away? :(
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Where'd this come from?? It says she got off the charge, but the last line that gets cut off is "She had her boyfriend chop up the body..." How is a line like that in the news story and yet she avoids the charge??
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
khatib: that's Massachusetts for you!
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
man i want a 56 year old lady to take me to her dungeon.. oh wait... no i don't
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Why, is being a dominatrix illegal? Stupid bitch. ALSO I CAAAAAAAAME.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
I think the first rule in a murder case is you need a BODY for an effective prosecution? If they have no body there's nothing tying her to his death.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Except of course for the confession, w3bx. Just that the inept interrogators failed to record it. And they failed to take notes. She got off due to inept law enforcement, not because she's innocent.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
omg awww
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Haha, lame.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
It's for real. http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/01/30/dominatrix.acquitted.ap/index.html
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
-3 because anyone can hit prntscrn.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Awesome.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
lollercoaster
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
56 year old dominatrix?wow
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
she was found not guilty due to the lack of evidence against her
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
5'd because her boyfriend helped her. Who dates a woman who runs an illegal prostitution ring out of her home? Slore.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
This sh*t's all over the news here in massachusetts, i dont need to see it on here.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
"Prosecutor donned leather bondage mask during argument" = fifen
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Just because someone is proclaimed "not guilty" doesn't mean they're not guilty. From the outside looking in, she's as guilty as the Manson family. Too bad she can't be tried for the same crime again.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
5 for BDSM. And wasn't this news story just posted on the best website in the world yesterday, right above "Man Creating Recipe Book for Roadkill"?
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Don't want to know
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
Haha. "If the mask does not fit, you must acquit."
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
You suck i hate you.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
wtf? think about the poor man's family. First they find him hanging around a dome, and then she kills him, and there is no justice in court? They just let her go? Terrible.
February 2nd, 2006
(0)
5